Íæż½ã½ã of America will hold its 92nd Annual Convention March 21 - 25, 2011 at the Bellagio Hotel in Las Vegas. Íæż½ã½ã is now accepting proposals for a limited number of speaking opportunities. The Íæż½ã½ã Annual Convention is geared towards educational sessions focused on current and emerging issues in construction, best practice presentations on key project-related areas or responsibilities, and unique challenges facing contractor owners and executives.Reasons to Present at Íæż½ã½ã's 92nd Annual Convention:Reach an audience of interested, committed construction owners and executives with your best practices, case studies, or other findings;Approximately three-thousand individuals from across the industry will be in attendance;Earn recognition as an expert within your field;Be a part of one of the most highly regarded conferences in the industry;Speakers receive special registration rates.For more information on Íæż½ã½ã's Annual Convention and to download the Call for Presentations application visit http://convention.agc.org.
The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is launching a pilot program seeking to partner with building inspectors in 11 cities to reduce injuries and fatalities at construction sites. The pilot program was initially announced during the April 14 - 15, 2010, Latino Worker Health and Safety Summit held in Houston, Texas.Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis has sent letters to the mayors of the selected cities, proposing that OSHA work with and train local building inspectors on hazards associated with the four leading causes of death (falls, electrocution, being crushed or caught between objects, or being struck by moving machinery or objects) at construction sites.Under this program, building inspectors would notify OSHA when they observe, during the course of their work, unsafe work conditions. OSHA, in turn, would send a federal agency compliance officer to that workplace for a safety inspection.OSHA seeks to partner with building inspectors in the following cities:Austin, TexasBoise, IdahoCincinnati, OhioConcord, N.H.Greenwood Village, Colo.Madison, Miss.Atlanta Metropolitan area, Ga.Newark, N.J.Oakland, Calif.Washington, D.C.Wichita, Kan.Íæż½ã½ã encourages Chapters and their members in the selected cities to meet with their local building inspectors to discuss the proposed partnership and express their concerns with this approach to policing safety. Meanwhile, Íæż½ã½ã will continue to monitor OSHA activities as they pertain to this issue. To view a copy of the letters click here.For more information, please contact Kevin Cannon at (703) 837-5410 or cannonk@agc.org.
The Summer 2010 BIMForum will focus on the primary principles involved in Lean design and construction and how building information modeling (BIM) can best be integrated into Lean construction practices. Anyone interested in learning more about BIM or developing the knowledge and competency needed to successfully implement BIM in your organization is encouraged to attend. Early registration is encouraged.The BIMForum has grown into an industry-leading user's group focused on the application of virtual design and construction for the AEC industry, and includes more than 1,800 members from across the commercial construction industry. BIMForum membership is NOT required to attend the Summer 2010 BIMForum.Registration: $325 if registered by May 19Additionally, participants are invited to take advantage of these additional BIMForum events:Â BIM 101: An Introduction to Building Information ModelingBIM TechnologyBIMForum Tours See complete details here.
On May 4, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed the first-ever national rules related to the disposal and management of coal ash from coal-fired power plants. Coal combustion wastes, including coal ash or fly ash, are widely used in construction applications.The agency will publish a proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register and begin taking comments on which of two regulatory paths the agency should follow under the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act (RCRA). One option is drawn from authorities available under Subtitle C, which creates a comprehensive program of federally enforceable requirements for waste management and disposal. The other option includes remedies under Subtitle D, which gives EPA authority to set performance standards for waste management facilities and would be enforced primarily through citizen suits.The agency states that today's action safeguards environmentally safe and desirable forms of recycling coal ash, known as beneficial uses. Under both approaches proposed by EPA, the agency would leave in place the Bevill exemption for beneficial uses of coal ash in which coal combustion residuals are recycled as components of products instead of placed in impoundments or landfills. Large quantities of coal ash are used today in concrete, cement, wallboard and other contained applications. These "encapsulated" uses would not be impacted by today's proposal. Other uses may be impacted. The public comment period is 90 days from the date the rule is published in the Federal Register. Íæż½ã½ã of America will comment on the proposed rule. If you would like to advise Íæż½ã½ã in the comment-writing process, please contact Melinda Tomaino at tomainom@agc.org or 703-837-5415. Íæż½ã½ã of America is concerned about implications to the shipping and handling of that material as well as any threats-stigma or otherwise-to beneficial use. Íæż½ã½ã previously reported on this issue in Íæż½ã½ã's Environmental Observer on February 24, 2010.More information about the proposed regulation can be found here: http://www.epa.gov/coalashrule.  To view the chart comparing the two approaches, please click here or go to http://www.epa.gov/coalashrule/ccr-table.htm.To view results of the impoundment assessments, please click here or go to: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/surveys2/index.htm.
Presented in partnership with Autodesk, Inc.In recent years, new technologies and practices have fundamentally changed how building projects are delivered. Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a prime example. When effectively implemented, it allows contractors to gain insight into cost, schedule and potential coordination issues-before work begins in the field. Construction Companies that have embraced a model-based approach to construction have quickly realized that a successful BIM deployment can deliver exceptional value and ROI. Join us to learn how the Autodesk BIM Deployment Plan can help you gain a competitive advantage and capitalize on the benefits BIM delivers.
June 16-17, 2010 - Indianapolis, Indiana - Early Bird Discount Ends TODAY!This year's program will build upon the previous series of successful meetings and will cover standardized practices, definitions and terminology in an effort to create a unified understanding of the four steps to successful project delivery, plus the ability to use Project Delivery Systems, definitions, selection and implementation. To register click here!
May 27, 2010 - 11:00 am - 12:30 pm ETFor less than $40, you will learn about critical key concepts for Integrated Project Delivery (IPD). This webinar will provide not only an introduction to IPD, but also will discuss the key principles necessary for a successful IPD construction project.Our panel of experts will explore the differences between the ConsensusDOCS 300 Tri-party Agreement and the AIA "transitional" and "single-purpose entity" forms, including:Structure and managementCosts and compensationRoles and responsibilitiesThe panel will peel back the legalese and present in layman's terms what these forms really mean to you and your project.Registration:Íæż½ã½ã Members:  $39Non-Member:  $79Duration: 90 minutes (including live Q & A)Register today! Íæż½ã½ã Members receive a special discounted price of just $39. Please contact Megan McGarvey at mcgarveym@agc.org or 703-837-5369 should you have questions.
Join key players in the building construction industry at the Íæż½ã½ã Building Contractors Conference in Midway, Utah, June 9-12, 2010. This Conference consistently offers a worthwhile and constructive experience to industry leaders who gather to network, exchange ideas, and hear presentations offering timely guidance and best practices. The Íæż½ã½ã Lean Construction Forum will feature several sessions, including Lean Construction: A Basic Refresher and case studies.Highlighted Sessions Include:Lean Construction: A Basic Refresher - George Zettel, Turner Construction Co.Lean Construction Case Studies - Linbeck Group, Baker Concrete Construction, Burt Hill and The Weitz CompanyEffluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs) and the Construction Industry - David G. Oshinski, The Home Depot; Jennifer Hildebrand, Weis Builders; and Richard S. Davis, Beveridge & Diamond P.C.ROI of Sustainable Designs - Robert Middlebrooks, AutodeskMaterials Prices: Spiking, Side-Stepping or Sliding? - Ken Simonson, Íæż½ã½ã of AmericaChallenges of Growth in Construction - José L. Fernández-SolÃs, PhD, Texas A&M UniversityLook for more information at www.agc.org/bcc. Register today! Travel discounts are available! Please refer to the Íæż½ã½ã Building Contractors Conference Travel Assistance Guide for more details.
On April 22, Íæż½ã½ã of America released a plan calling for market-based solutions, incentives and needed investments to deliver environmental improvements in our nation's infrastructure-buildings, transportation, water and land resources and power generation.The plan-Building a Green Future-outlines measures designed to stimulate demand for green construction projects, boost infrastructure capacity, improve building efficiency and green construction practices. It openly addresses how the places where we live, work, play and travel impact the natural environment; and it gives credit to industry and other groups for their efforts to reduce those impacts. The plan offers recommendations to stimulate demand for new investment in our infrastructure-making it greener and safer. It provides some common sense ways that contractors can help, such as recycling waste and reducing emissions from equipment; and it also addresses how policymakers can support those efforts instead of setting up roadblocks."You can't wish for a green future-you have to build it." Íæż½ã½ã maintains that construction and renovation ultimately are the most immediate and effective ways to improve the built environment. Íæż½ã½ã intends to use this plan to guide policymakers, educate the public and provide members with a tool they can use to develop an environmental strategy for their firm.Íæż½ã½ã of America and the Íæż½ã½ã of Washington unveiled the plan after a tour of a construction site for a green building in Seattle. The new structure will serve as local construction firm McKinstry's incubator space for start-up green construction technology firms. Citing that company's recent successes, David D'Hondt (executive vice president, Íæż½ã½ã of Washington) said that while the plan would deliver significant environmental benefits, it also would provide new opportunities for the nation's hard-hit construction firms.To read the plan, go to www.agc.org/greenfuture.
EPA's Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (RRP) rule was fully implemented on April 22, 2010. Under the current rules, contractors who perform renovations, repairs and/or painting projects in most pre-1978 housing, child-care facilities and schools (i.e., that have, or are assumed to have, lead-based paint) must comply with federal accreditation, training, certification, and recordkeeping requirements, or risk fines of up to $37,500 per day per violation.  Íæż½ã½ã has distributed news articles that explain the legal requirements and contractor responsibilities - click here.Note: EPA can authorize states to administer and enforce their own RRP programs. Several states have already done so (e.g., Kansas, Rhode Island, Utah, Mississippi, Wisconsin, Iowa and North Carolina), and several more have introduced legislation to take over the RRP rule.Adding to the already complex regulatory regime, EPA has just taken three new actions that widen the rule's potential impact on the construction industry. 1. Most notably, in an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR), EPA announced its intention to apply lead-safe work practices and other requirements to renovations on the exteriors of public and commercial buildings. The advance notice also announces EPA's investigation into whether lead-based paint hazards are created by interior renovation, repair and painting projects in public and commercial buildings. If EPA determines that lead-based paint hazards are created by interior renovations, EPA will propose regulations at a later date to address the hazards.2. EPA also has eliminated the so-called "opt-out" provision. (The RRP rule originally provided an exemption from the training and work requirements if the property owner certifies that no child under six and no pregnant woman resides in the subject premises.) This final rule also requires renovation firms to provide a copy of the records demonstrating compliance with the training and work practice requirements of the RRP rule to the owner (and to the occupant of the building being renovated or the operator of the child-occupied facility, if different).3. In addition, EPA made a separate rulemaking proposal that would require contractors to perform "dust-wipe testing" after most renovation, repair, and painting activities covered by the RRP rule to show that dust-lead levels comply with EPA's regulatory standards. Regulated contractors would also need to provide the results of the testing to the owners and occupants of the building. For some of these renovations, the proposal would require that lead dust levels after the renovation be below the regulatory dust-lead hazard standards.In related news, in response to an August 2009 petition submitted to EPA by the National Center for Healthy Housing, the Alliance for Healthy Homes and the Sierra Club, EPA has agreed to issue a proposal to (1) modify the regulatory definition of "lead-based paint" and (2) lower the regulatory dust-lead hazard standards. The Agency has not, however, committed to either a specific rulemaking outcome or a certain date for promulgation of a final rule.To get the detailed story, please click here.