Íæż½ã½ã

The U.S. Senate is expected to vote this month on a resolution this month that would block the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act.  Íæż½ã½ã is concerned that Clean Air Act regulation of greenhouse gases would delay or stop construction projects nationwide.S. J. Res. 26 was introduced by Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) in response to EPA's effort to regulate greenhouse gases from motor vehicles that then trigger requirements for emission controls from all other sources, including commercial buildings, industrial facilities, and more.   EPA regulation under the Clean Air Act means more pre-construction permits, operating permits, and costly technology control installation requirements for building projects, and puts approval and federal funding for highway and bridge projects at risk.  It also means higher energy process for businesses and consumers that will affect demand for construction services nationwide, especially in a down economy. Íæż½ã½ã urges all members to contact their Senators in support of Senator Murkowski's resolution.  To send a message to your Senators, you can use Íæż½ã½ã's Legislative Action Center by clicking here.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (RRP) rule was fully implemented on April 22, 2010.  Under the current rules, contractors who perform renovations, repairs and/or painting projects in most pre-1978 housing, child-care facilities and schools (i.e., that have, or are assumed to have, lead-based paint) must comply with federal accreditation, training, certification and recordkeeping requirements, or risk fines of up to $37,500 per day per violation. Adding to the already complex regulatory regime, EPA has just taken three new actions that widen the rule's potential impact on the construction industry.  Most notably, EPA is also exploring whether or not to impose the RRP requirements to the exteriors - and possibly even the interiors - of all public and commercial buildings. 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today has proposed the first-ever national rules related to the disposal and management of coal ash from coal-fired power plants.  Coal combustion wastes, including coal ash or fly ash, are widely used in construction applications.

In response to a federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) solicitation for comments on green jobs, Íæż½ã½ã of America has submitted comments that ask the BLS to re-think its intentions, based on our belief that such a task is both beyond the scope of the Bureau's mission and impossible to complete accurately.

Last week, the California Air Resources Board admitted that its earlier estimates of the emissions from the off-road diesel equipment in California were too high, and in light of both its mistakes and the downturn in the economy, agreed to amend its costly off-road rule. This action followed Íæż½ã½ã's release of its own study of such emissions, where Íæż½ã½ã found that the Board's original estimates exceeded actual emissions by at least 350 percent.  Íæż½ã½ã also found and announced that - in the absence of any off-road rule - the construction and other regulated industries will exceed the Board's goals for emissions of particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) through 2020 and 2025, respectively.How dramatically the Board will change the rule remains to be seen.  While it admitted to making a mistake, the Board maintained that it had overestimated emissions by no more than 100 percent, and did not make any specific commitments.  It did, however, agree to consider the following:Greater reliance on turnover to Tier IV equipment (which will not become available in the higher horsepower equipment until 2015) to improve air quality;While maintaining the structure of the current rule, streamlining its requirements;Providing some additional delay in the enforcement of the rule (which the Board has already agreed to stay until the U.S Environmental Protection Agency gives the Board the legal authority to enforce it);Reducing the retrofit, repower and replacement requirements that would otherwise take effect before 2015; andClassifying more vehicles as low use, and therefore exempt from the rule.The Board also sought to reassure the contractors that have already complied with the rule, indicating that it will give these contractors credit for anything they have already done to reduce their emissions.Íæż½ã½ã of America and both of its California Chapters will continue to monitor the situation carefully.  Íæż½ã½ã has already asked the Board to delay all of the requirements for retrofitting, repowering, replacing or retiring existing equipment until 2015, and to eliminate all of the requirements specifically for NOx.   At this point, it remains far from clear that the Board is willing to go that far.  On the other hand, Íæż½ã½ã has yet to review or comment on ways that the Board estimated the size of its earlier mistake, or to hold any follow-up discussions with the decision makers.

Last week, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) admitted that its earlier estimates of the emissions from the off-road diesel equipment in California were too high, and in light of both its mistakes and the downturn in the economy, agreed to amend its costly off-road rule. 

U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Jim Oberstar (D-Minn.) April 21 introduced the "America's Commitment to Clean Water Act" (H.R. 5088) to "clarify" federal jurisdiction over waters and wetlands under the Clean Water Act.  The bill would remove the term "navigable" from the Act and replace it with the phrase "waters of the United States." 

On April 22, Íæż½ã½ã of America released a plan calling for market-based solutions, incentives and needed investments to deliver environmental improvements in our nation's infrastructure-buildings, transportation, water and land resources and power generation.

Gary Janco of member company CC Myers Inc. telling reporters about how CARB's new off-road diesel emissions rule is hurting his business, forcing layoffs. Emissions from California's construction and other off-road diesel equipment are less than 28 percent of what state officials have estimated, Íæż½ã½ã announced on April 21. As a result, the California Air Resources Board has no scientific justification for sticking to a new rule requiring construction contractors to spend billions of dollars on their existing equipment.

Jon Cloud testified before EPA on California's proposed diesel retrofit rule. Íæż½ã½ã member Jon Cloud testified before the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on April 14 to explain how California's plan to require construction contractors to install emissions reduction kits on their off-road diesel equipment will endanger workers and force job cuts.